|
LETTERSLast updated 12-31-08 at 12:24 p.m.In Soo Chun’s apparent suicideTo the Editor: In Soo Chun, 61, took his own life on the Red Square
on of the University of Washington campus on Oct. 30, 2008. He doused
himself with gasoline and set himself on fire, in full view of the
UW administration building. Those who witnessed the event saw something terrifying
that they will never forget. Others may have heard
about it on television or read about it in the
newspaper and thought, ‘That’s terrible,’ as
they continued to surf channels or flipped the
pages of a newspaper without another thought. The UW officials claimed he committed suicide.
However, what he did falls more in line with sacrificing his life for
a cause or protesting something. Two months have passed since his death,
but that does not diminish what Mr. Chun did. If Chun would have wanted to just commit suicide,
he could have done so in the privacy of his own home and it would have
probably gone unnoticed except to the few that knew him. On the other
hand, if Chun was protesting, then his death needs to be examined more
closely; otherwise his sacrifice was in vain. He was a schoolteacher in Korea. Chun emigrated from Korea to the
United States in 1977 where he earned his bachelors in political science
in Portland and a master’s in political science at the UW. Then
he became a U.S. citizen. Chun was not what is considered a normal custodian. He was highly
educated, probably more so than most up his chain
of command. Chun obviously gave his apparent sacrifice much
thought. What could Mr. Chun have been protesting, if he was in
fact protesting? What happened to Mr. Chun that could have driven
him to such a protest? Could it have possibly been
something he witnessed on the university campus?
Was Chun’s sacrifice
related to the way he was dismissed from his job? Did Chun commit suicide or sacrifice himself so that others might benefit? Did he give his life on behalf of others? If he did sacrifice himself on behalf of others, then aren’t we obligated to find out why? —Charles Peters, Seattle Filipino fighters do us proudTo the Editor: Being of half-Filipino decent, I take pride in Filipino
fighters. Watching Manny Pacquiao fights has had
bigger turn outs at Filipino households than a
New Year’s party.
You published a good article about the Filipino Wrecking Machine
Mark Munoz (written by Jason Cruz in issue 52). I hope many Filipinos understand that mixed martial
arts (MMA) is different than boxing, and the greatest
in the world are never undefeated. Holding on to the belt for
more than a year is very unlikely in MMA. On the reality show “Ultimate Fighter,” finalist Phillipe
Nover made me even more of a fan of MMA when he made
the other fighters in the house try a balut egg,
opening MMA fans to the Filipino culture and its cuisine. Nover was
not afraid to show the world our culture and who we are as human
beings. These fighters will inspire other Filipino fighters
to fight in MMA. The Ultimate Fighting Championship
should be thankful for their Filipino fighters and
understand that the fighters will bring more money
to the business. |
BRIEFLY• WB shrouds 'Dark Knight' from Chinese audiences• Puget Sound Blood Center needs your help: Blood supply drops 20 percent due to weather• Somalia’s president to quit after 4 years in powerON THE SHELF
• Novel about 'intentional loser' good for laughs but little elseread all articles |
|
Home | About Us | Youth | Women Empowered | Contact | Site Map | Ad Rates | Seattle Chinese Post | Blog |